Politics
Kaduna Tribunal Upholds Uba Sani’s Election On Technical Grounds
|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Kaduna tribunal upholds Uba Sani’s election on technical grounds
By Mohammed Ahmed, Kaduna
The Kaduna State Governorship Election Petition Tribunal on Thursday upheld the election of Governor Uba Sani of the All Progressives Congress (APC) in a judgement delivered via Zoom and lasted five and half hours.
The three-member panel led by Justice Victor Oviawie, in a split decision of 2:1, dismissed the petition filed by the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) governorship candidate, Isah Mohammed Ashiru.
Initial reports had suggested that the tribunal had declared the election inconclusive.
However, details of the lead judgement showed that Justice Victor Oviawie found and held that the preliminary notice was filed outside the time prescribed by the constitution from the day when the result of the election was declared, and that the petition was deemed to be abandoned. His ruling was also seconded by Justice N. Nonye, while Justice K. Damlat disagreed with the ruling, noting that the preliminary notice was properly filed and not abandoned.
However, in compliance with the Supreme Court standing order, the tribunal delved into the substantive matter to look at the merit of the petition.
The tribunal in the lead judgement supported by Justices K. Damlat and N. Nonye said the petitioner was able to prove beyond doubt that the election was invalid in 22 polling units across four local government areas.
It held that the number of registered voters in the four local governments was more than the 10,806 votes margin with which Sani defeated Ashiru, thus the election was inconclusive.
However, in a dissenting judgement, Justice Oviawie said that the allegations that the elections were invalid in those 22 polling units within four local governments were not proved beyond doubt.
Reacting to the judgement, counsel to the APC, Sanusi Musa, said they were happy with the judgment and had no course to file any appeal as the judgment was in their favour.
“The tribunal has dismissed the petition filed by PDP and its candidate in the lead judgement. The tribunal ruled that the petition had been abandoned and it was dismissed. We are happy with the judgement because it affirmed the election of Governor Uba Sani,” he said.
According to him, “When the tribunal looked at the merit of the petition, two of the judges said election in 22 polling units is inconclusive because the number of registered voters is more than the margin between the winner and the runners up.”
It affirms mandate given to me- Gov Sani
Responding, Governor Sani the judgement was a clear affirmation of the popular mandate given to him by the people of the state.
“The judgement is an unequivocal affirmation of the popular mandate graciously given to me by the good people of Kaduna State,” he said in a statement he personally signed.
“I commend the tribunal for their thoroughness and lucidity. They have enriched our jurisprudence and practice of electoral democracy.
“I also commend my dear brother, Hon. Isah Ashiru Kudan for approaching the tribunal to ventilate his grievances.
“This is a clear demonstration of his belief in the principles of democracy and the imperative of civility in the conduct of political actors.
“I call on Hon. Isah Ashiru and members of the opposition parties in Kaduna State to join hands with us as we strive to move our dear state to a higher level.
“We are all stakeholders in PROJECT KADUNA. It is not about personal glory. Our people want all hands to be on deck to address the myriad challenges confronting the state. If political actors are united, a clear signal will be sent to our people that the quest for peace, security, progress and development of our state are the driving forces of our participation in politics.
“I call on our party faithful to moderate their celebration of this victory. They must individually and collectively extend an olive branch to our brothers and sisters in other political parties.
“Instead of celebrating, we should bow down in prayers to the Almighty God for His continued guidance and protection. Let us focus on the tasks ahead.”
We’ll appeal – Ashiru
Meanwhile, the PDP governorship candidate has urged his supporters to remain law abiding. Ashiru, in a statement he personally signed and issued after the verdicts, assured the people that he would pursue the mandate they gave him to its logical conclusion.
He said, “Given the ruling of the Kaduna State Election Tribunal, it has become necessary to share with our teaming supporters, the true position of the ruling.
“…The tribunal, based on the majority of 2:1 judges upheld the preliminary objection of the respondent to the effect that the application for pre-hearing was done prematurely, i.e. before the service of the last set of petitioners’ reply to the 2nd respondent’s reply to the petition was served.
“However, the law enjoins the tribunal, as a trial court, to proceed to pronounce on the merit of the substantive suit so that in the event the court of appeal finds that the trial tribunal was wrong in its decision on the preliminary objection, it would have the benefit of pronouncing on the decision of the tribunal in the substantive matter.
“Accordingly, the trial tribunal finds merit in the aspect of the petitioner’s case relative to the margin of win between the two leading candidates. The tribunal by a split decision of 2:1, accordingly nullified the election of the governor of Kaduna State, ordered that the Certificate of Return be retrieved and fresh elections be conducted in some polling units in 4 LGAs and the outcome thereof be reckoned with before the declaration of the winner of the governorship election in Kaduna state.
“I want to again thank the people of the state while urging them all to remain law abiding while we pursue the appeal process.
“One thing I can assure the good people of Kaduna state is that I will pursue this mandate you freely gave me to its logical conclusion and by the grace of God, victory on our side.”
Also, counsel to the PDP, Baba Aliyu, in his reaction to the judgment said, “We are not fully satisfied with the judgment because we wanted our client to be declared the winner of the election based on our arguments and facts laid before the tribunal.”
Advertisements
Advertisements
TAGSISAH MOHAMMED ASHIRUKADUNA STATE GOVERNORSHIP ELECTION PETITION TRIBUNALUBA SANI
Previous article
Ogun tribunal sets date to deliver judgment on Adebutu’s petition
Next article
Nami, ex-FIRS boss denies spending N11bn after sack, says he briefed Zacch Adedeji
RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR
News
Nami, ex-FIRS boss denies spending N11bn after sack, says he briefed Zacch Adedeji
News
Ogun tribunal sets date to deliver judgment on Adebutu’s petition
News
Obaseki accepts deputy’s apology
Law & Crime
Mohbad: Sam Larry arrested
News
Ogun ex-LG Chairman regains freedom after two days in prison
News
Over 4,000 registered for Kano mass wedding – Hisbah Board
EDITOR PICKS
Supreme Court fire caused by electrical fault, says spokesman
Editor – 25 September 2023
Tinubu’s certificate: Atiku is seeking disclosure to expose identity fraud – Obaseki
Editor – 26 September 2023
Sanwo-Olu orders red rail line contractor to deliver project December
Editor – 28 September 2023
Kano’s Gov sacked by election tribunal appoints additional 94 media aides
Editor – 28 September 2023
Contact us: info@thenewsmatrics.com
EVEN MORE NEWS
Nami, ex-FIRS boss denies spending N11bn after sack, says he briefed…
29 September 2023
Ogun tribunal sets date to deliver judgment on Adebutu’s petition
29 September 2023
Obaseki accepts deputy’s apology
29 September 2023
POPULAR CATEGORY
News4178
Law & Crime619
Politics510
Business484
2023 elections260
2023 Presidential Race237
Education166
About us Contact us Privacy Policy Advert rates
© Thenewsmatrics.com
MORE STORIES
Nami, ex-FIRS boss denies spending N11bn after sack, says he briefed…
29 September 2023
Ogun tribunal sets date to deliver judgment on Adebutu’s petition
29 September 2023
Obaseki accepts deputy’s apology
29 September 2023
FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 29, 2023 ABOUT US CONTACT US PRIVACY POLICY ADVERT RATES
The News Matrics
HOME
NEWS
POLITI
Kaduna tribunal upholds Uba Sani’s election on technical grounds
The Kaduna State Governorship Election Petition Tribunal on Thursday upheld the election of Governor Uba Sani of the All Progressives Congress (APC) in a judgement delivered via Zoom and lasted five and half hours.
The three-member panel led by Justice Victor Oviawie, in a split decision of 2:1, dismissed the petition filed by the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) governorship candidate, Isah Mohammed Ashiru.
Initial reports had suggested that the tribunal had declared the election inconclusive.
However, details of the lead judgement showed that Justice Victor Oviawie found and held that the preliminary notice was filed outside the time prescribed by the constitution from the day when the result of the election was declared, and that the petition was deemed to be abandoned. His ruling was also seconded by Justice N. Nonye, while Justice K. Damlat disagreed with the ruling, noting that the preliminary notice was properly filed and not abandoned.
However, in compliance with the Supreme Court standing order, the tribunal delved into the substantive matter to look at the merit of the petition.
The tribunal in the lead judgement supported by Justices K. Damlat and N. Nonye said the petitioner was able to prove beyond doubt that the election was invalid in 22 polling units across four local government areas.
It held that the number of registered voters in the four local governments was more than the 10,806 votes margin with which Sani defeated Ashiru, thus the election was inconclusive.
However, in a dissenting judgement, Justice Oviawie said that the allegations that the elections were invalid in those 22 polling units within four local governments were not proved beyond doubt.
Reacting to the judgement, counsel to the APC, Sanusi Musa, said they were happy with the judgment and had no course to file any appeal as the judgment was in their favour.
“The tribunal has dismissed the petition filed by PDP and its candidate in the lead judgement. The tribunal ruled that the petition had been abandoned and it was dismissed. We are happy with the judgement because it affirmed the election of Governor Uba Sani,” he said.
According to him, “When the tribunal looked at the merit of the petition, two of the judges said election in 22 polling units is inconclusive because the number of registered voters is more than the margin between the winner and the runners up.”
It affirms mandate given to me- Gov Sani
Responding, Governor Sani the judgement was a clear affirmation of the popular mandate given to him by the people of the state.
“The judgement is an unequivocal affirmation of the popular mandate graciously given to me by the good people of Kaduna State,” he said in a statement he personally signed.
“I commend the tribunal for their thoroughness and lucidity. They have enriched our jurisprudence and practice of electoral democracy.
“I also commend my dear brother, Hon. Isah Ashiru Kudan for approaching the tribunal to ventilate his grievances.
“This is a clear demonstration of his belief in the principles of democracy and the imperative of civility in the conduct of political actors.
“I call on Hon. Isah Ashiru and members of the opposition parties in Kaduna State to join hands with us as we strive to move our dear state to a higher level.
“We are all stakeholders in PROJECT KADUNA. It is not about personal glory. Our people want all hands to be on deck to address the myriad challenges confronting the state. If political actors are united, a clear signal will be sent to our people that the quest for peace, security, progress and development of our state are the driving forces of our participation in politics.
“I call on our party faithful to moderate their celebration of this victory. They must individually and collectively extend an olive branch to our brothers and sisters in other political parties.
“Instead of celebrating, we should bow down in prayers to the Almighty God for His continued guidance and protection. Let us focus on the tasks ahead.”
We’ll appeal – Ashiru
Meanwhile, the PDP governorship candidate has urged his supporters to remain law abiding. Ashiru, in a statement he personally signed and issued after the verdicts, assured the people that he would pursue the mandate they gave him to its logical conclusion.
He said, “Given the ruling of the Kaduna State Election Tribunal, it has become necessary to share with our teaming supporters, the true position of the ruling.
“…The tribunal, based on the majority of 2:1 judges upheld the preliminary objection of the respondent to the effect that the application for pre-hearing was done prematurely, i.e. before the service of the last set of petitioners’ reply to the 2nd respondent’s reply to the petition was served.
“However, the law enjoins the tribunal, as a trial court, to proceed to pronounce on the merit of the substantive suit so that in the event the court of appeal finds that the trial tribunal was wrong in its decision on the preliminary objection, it would have the benefit of pronouncing on the decision of the tribunal in the substantive matter.
“Accordingly, the trial tribunal finds merit in the aspect of the petitioner’s case relative to the margin of win between the two leading candidates. The tribunal by a split decision of 2:1, accordingly nullified the election of the governor of Kaduna State, ordered that the Certificate of Return be retrieved and fresh elections be conducted in some polling units in 4 LGAs and the outcome thereof be reckoned with before the declaration of the winner of the governorship election in Kaduna state.
“I want to again thank the people of the state while urging them all to remain law abiding while we pursue the appeal process.
“One thing I can assure the good people of Kaduna state is that I will pursue this mandate you freely gave me to its logical conclusion and by the grace of God, victory on our side.”
Also, counsel to the PDP, Baba Aliyu, in his reaction to the judgment said, “We are not fully satisfied with the judgment because we wanted our client to be declared the winner of the election based on our arguments and facts laid before the tribunal.”
